VINOD KUMAR VERMA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/3214/2025 · 2025-04-16
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134107 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 134107 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21285 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3214 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Verma And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rinku Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned A.G.A. for the State that present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable inasmuch as the matter is relating to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and therefore, the proper remedy for the applicants is to file appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 14A of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
3. The aforesaid fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the applicants.
4. In such view of the fact, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to file appeal under Section 14A of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
5. Office is directed to return the original copy of the compromise deed as well as certified copy of charge sheet to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining a photostat copy of the same on record. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench