IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMA FRIDAY THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: OF onoR Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the non-adjudication of the Original Suit vide O.S. No. 182 of 2013 pending on the file of the Senior Civil Judge Gurazala. , at Between: Kolia Brahma Reddy, S/o. Seetha Reddy, Aged about 72 Teacher, R/o. D. No. 4-181, Dachepalli Mandal District, A.P. - 522414 years, Occ- Retd, and Village, Palnadu ...Petitioner/Plaintiff AND 1. Kola Kotamma, (Died as per LRs.) 2. Kola Govinda Reddy, S/o. Seetha Reddy, Aged about D.No. 4-180, Redia Bazaar, Dachepalli Mandal District, A.P. 3. Gogireddy Vimala @ Veeramma, W/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged about 50 years, R/o. H.No. 1-3-161, Kissan Nagar, Bhongiri, Nalgonda Telangana - 508116 60 years, R/o. and Village Palnadu District, ...Respondents/Defendants > \A 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with in filling the Certified Copy of the Court proceedings in O.S No. 182 of 2013 on the file of the Hon’ble Senior Civil Judge, Gurazala in the present C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BHUVANAGIRI SUBRAMANYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following: 4' APHC010160942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] y.j 0?? •FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 882 OF 2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Kolia Brahma Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Kola Kotamma and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BHUVANAGIRI SUBRAMANYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2 ✓ The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The present Civil Revision Petition is preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner while making the submissions, inter alia, drawn the attention of this Court to the material filed along with the Revision Petition and states that though the suit was filed in the year 2013, the same was dismissed for default on 12.08.2014. He submits that immediately an application seeking restoration of the suit was filed and separate application was also filed to bring the legal representatives of the deceased defendant on record. He submits that the lAs., were ordered on 18.12.2024 and the abatement order was set aside. He submits that the petitioner/plaintiff is aged about 72 years and the delay in disposal of the suit is affecting his interest on the subject matter property. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks appropriate direction to the learned trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously. Considering the submissions made, the Civil Revision Petition' is disposed of providing that the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gurazala, shall make an endeavor to dispose of the suit i.e., O.S.No.182 of 2013 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of six (06) months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISm;^ //TRUE COPY// SE ON OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurazala, Guntur District. 2. One CC to Sri. Bhuvanagiri Subramanya Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies MKP sree ✓ HIGH COURT DATED :20/06/2025 ORDER CRP.No.882 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE C.R.P. WITHOUT COSTS