Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13404 (JHR)

SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./999/2021 · 2025-09-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:26679] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.999 of 2021 ------ Santosh Kumar Yadav, son of Ram Chandra Yadav, aged about 32 years, resident of Basu Babu, Near Shiv Mandir, P.O. Tungri, P.S. Sadar, District- West Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ayush Kumar Thakur, son of Rajesh Kumar Thakur, resident of Barkandaj Toli, Gwala Pati, P.O. and P.S. Chaibasa, District- West Singhbhum 3. Aman Kumar Thakur, son of not known to the petitioner, resident of Barkandaj Toli, Gwala Pati, P.O. and P.S. Chaibasa, District- West Singhbhum … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the O.P. No.3 : Mr. Madhav Prasad, Advocate ------ Order No:-09 Dated:-02-09-2025 Heard the learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 and 3. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/