S LAKSHMAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST v. ANAKAPALLE MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS COMMR, VISAKHA DT
CRP/3886/2015 · 2025-07-23
Harinath N
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13404 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13404 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010160972015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3886/2015 Between:
1. S LAKSHMAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST, S/O.IATE CHINA LAKSHMINARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.10-9-8, PEDDIRAJUPETA, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. ANAKAPALLE MUNICIPALITY REP BY ITS COMMR VISAKHA DT, Rep.by its Commissioner, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K.MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR GVMC)
2. The Court made the following:
2
Order:-
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive any further in view of the order passed in C.M.A. No. 72 of 2014 (Old C.M.A.No.44/2012) by the Court of the X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, Anakapalle, against the petitioner, in relation to the injunction petition in I.A. No. 138 of 2012 in O.S. No. 48 of 2012, passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Anakapalle.
3. Recording the same, no further orders are required in this Civil Revision Petition.
4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 24.07.2025 PNS