Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13403 (CAL)

SUBRATA SARKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/5097/2025 · 2025-05-08

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L 2 08.05.2025 Kausik ct.no.35 W.P.A. 5097 of 2025 Subrata Sarkar Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Arka Kumar Nag Mr. Ratikanta Pal …for the petitioner. Mr. S.P. Dalapati …for the private respondents. Mr. Suman Sengupta, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Amrita Panja Moulick …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that at present the petitioner is not faced with any inconveniences. Learned advocate for the private respondent nos. 7 to 9 is present. Mr. Sengupta, learned advocate appears on behalf of the State. Additionally it has been submitted that so far as the issues relating to reconnection of electricity is concerned, the same is pending before a co-ordinate bench. Having regard to the change of circumstances, I am of the view further pendency of the writ petition is unwarranted. Instructions be 2 sent by the learned advocate for the State to the Inspector-in-charge, Narendrapur Police Station that he would oversee that no inconveniences is caused to the petitioners for the next one month and would follow up if any information is furnished by the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations WPA 5097 of 2025 is disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)