- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21831 RSA No. 105 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.105 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. NARASAPPA @ NARASIMHAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 3. SHIVAKUMAR S/O NARSAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YERS, APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT KUDAVATHI VILLAGE NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALALPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562103. 4. SMT. GAYATHRAMMA W/O VENKANARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT C PURA VILLAGE RAJAGHATTA POST DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RUAL DISTRICT-561203. 5. SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O NARAYANASWAMY Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21831 RSA No. 105 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT THIMMANAYAKANAHALLI DIBBURAHALLI POST SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ANANDA H.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O RAMANJINAPPA D/O NARASAPPA @ NARASIMHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT SONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE KONAGHATTA MANDAL SHIVAPURA POST DODADBALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561205. 2. M/S. MSK. SHELTERS OFFICE AT NO.2 MSK SQUARE BSK 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560070 REP. BY ITS PARTNER SURESH KUMAR M., …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.08.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.59/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.02.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.316/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHIKKABALLAPURA. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21831 RSA No. 105 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants is absent. This appeal was filed in the year 2022 and when the matter listed before the Court on 24.01.2022, four weeks time was granted and again on 09.07.2024, this Court granted two weeks time to comply with office objections. This matter again listed before the Court on 25.07.2024, the counsel was absent and for a period of one year, inspite of finally two weeks time granted, office objections are not complied and the counsel is absent today also. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-compliance. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21