2025:JHHC:28297-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.72 of 2025 Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd., a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, having its Head Office at Brahmaputra House, A-7, Mahipalpur, P.O. Mahipalpur, P.S. Mahipalpur, District New Delhi, through its Vice President (HR and Legal), Shri Rajesh Gupta, aged about 62 years, son of Shri Satya Dev Gupta, working at Brahmaputra House, A-7, Mahipalpur, P.O. Mahipalpur, P.S. Mahipalpur, District New Delhi. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Road Construction, Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Government of Jharkhand, Lohardaga, P.O. Lohardaga, P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction, Road Division, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. The Union of India, through the Director General (RD) and SS, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, Transport Bhawan, Sansad Marg, P.O. New Delhi, P.S. New Delhi, District New Delhi. 6. The Chief Engineer, LWE Ministry of Road Transport and Highway, Government of India, Transport Bhawan, Sansad Marg, P.O. New Delhi, P.S. New Delhi, District New Delhi. … Respondents ---------- Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- 2025:JHHC:28297-DB 2 For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Srikant Swaroop, AC to AAG-II For UOI : Mrs. Niki Sinha, CGC ----- Order No.06/Dated 16.09.2025 1. Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after some arguments, on instruction, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this civil review with liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance involved in the writ petition before appropriate forum. 2. There is no opposition on behalf of learned counsel for the State and Union of India. 3. Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed as withdrawn and, as such, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance involved in the writ petition before appropriate forum. 4. Pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Rajnish/R.K.