Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13400 (RAJ)

SUSHILA KUMARI v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/9275/2009 · 2025-03-20

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12919] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9275/2009 Sushila Kumari D/o Bheem Singh age @ 40 years, R/o V/P Raipur Ahiran, Tehsil Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan Posted as ANM- Prasavika at Singhada P.H.C. Sayara Block Gogunda Distt. Udaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through to the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Medical & Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical & Health Services, Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical and Health Officer (CM & HO) Distt. Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arshad Khan for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, Addl. GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/03/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to not to insist the petitioner to submit fresh bond and issue directions to them to provide her regular salary. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the State-respondents apprised this Court that during pendency of this petition, regular appointed has been given to the petitioner on 28.04.2020 and the petitioner is getting regular salary under the pay matrix at level L- 08. Learned counsel submits that, under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to [2025:RJ-JP:12919] (2 of 2) [CW-9275/2009] continue with this petition and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. All applications (pending, if any) stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/124