Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13399 (PNJ)

HARPAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/2320/2025 · 2025-01-17

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

103 IN T Harpal Singh State of Punjab a CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. A Mr. I TRIBHUVAN D The Suraksha Sanhita take appropriate a the petitioner’s re 2. Lear instructions from that essentially th the petitioner has and is a party to under Sections 3 Sanhita, 2023 (BN also been register IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2320-20 Date of Decision Versus and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBH Mr. Simranjeet Singh Sarwara, Advo Mr. Anurag Chopra, Addl.A.G., Pun Mr. Ivneet Singh Pabla, Advocate fo AN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed under Se anhita, 2023, seeking directions to off riate action against the private respon er’s representation dated 25.11.2024, Learned State counsel, appearin from ASI Kuldeep Singh No.1230 ally the matter pertains to a land dispu has bought a part of the disputed rty to the dispute, a criminal case, ions 303(2), 329(3), 351(2), 324(4) 23 (BNS), Police Station Sadar, Distr gistered against him and his family m NJAB AND HARYANA 2025 cision : 17.01.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents RIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate for the petitioner. ., Punjab. ate for respondent Nos.8 to 11. der Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik to official respondent nos.2 to 4, to respondent nos.5 to 11 by deciding 2024, Annexure P-5. pearing on advance notice, on 1230, P.S. Sadar, Rajpura, contends dispute between two brothers. Since puted land from one of the brothers case, FIR No.131 dated 20.11.2024 324(4), 61(2) of Bhartiya Nayaya r, District Patiala, Annexure P-3, has ily members. Nevertheless, his agrik 4, to iding on tends ince thers 2024 yaya has PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.21 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-2320-20 representation da Senior Superinten action, as may be 3. In vi counsel for the pe terms thereof. 4. Orde January 17, 2025 ps 2025 -2- ion dated 25.11.2024, Annexure P- erintendent of Police, Patiala/respond ay be required, in accordance with law In view of the statement made by l the petitioner has no objection to the Ordered accordingly. , 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable -5, will be looked into by the espondent no.2, and an appropriate ith law will be taken promptly. by learned State counsel, learned to the petition being disposed of in (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No he riate rned of in PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.21 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document