RAVI KUMAR DAS ALIAS RAVI KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4026/2025 · 2025-06-12
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13399 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13399 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:15241] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4026 of 2025
Ravi Kumar Das @ Ravi Kumar, aged about 24 years, son of Shankar Das @ Shankar Mahra, resident of Village Amgachhi, P.O. Malhara, P.S. Mohanpur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Choudhary , Adv. For the State : Ms. Shweta Singh , Addl.PP.
02 / 12.06.2025
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.37 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84C of I.T. Act..
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has defrauded the victim namely Praveen Kumar to the tune of Rs. 99,969/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of recovery of one mobile phone with two SIM cards from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 01.03.2025, as mentioned in para 16 of this bail application. It is next submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes to transfer Rs. 99,969/- to the bank
account of R. Praveen Kumar without prejudice to his defence in this case. hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail, on showing the proof that the petitioner has transferred Rs. 99,969/- to the bank account of R. Praveen Kumar, without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.37 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-