SUNIL MAHANTA v. THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA and 4 ORS.
WP(C)/4869/2016 · 2025-05-28
Suman Shyam
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13399 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13399 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010116702016
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4869/2016 SUNIL MAHANTA S/O- LT. KESHAB CH. MAHANTA, R/O VILL.- HARIBHANGA, P.O. and P.S.- TIHU, DIST.- NALBARI, ASSAM. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT COLLEGE ROAD, BISWANATH CHARIALI, P.O. and P.S.- BISWANATH CHARIALI, DIST.- SONITPUR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA and 4 ORS.
HAVING CENTRAL OFFICE AT YOGAKSHWMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, MUMBAI- 400021, WITH ZONAL OFFICE AT SEVERAL ZONES INCLUDING THE EASTERN ZONAL OFFICE AT KOLKATA AND WITH DIVISIONAL OFFICES ALL OVER INDIA INCLUDING ONE DIVISIONAL OFFICE AT JEEVAN PRAKASH, S.S. ROAD, GHY- 1, HAVING SERVERAL BRANCH OFFICES UNDER EASCH DIVISION INCLUDING AT MORIGAON, BISWANATH CHARIALI, JOWAI ETC., UNDER GUWAHATI DIVISIONAL OFFICE AND REP. BY ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND OTHER OFFICERS OF GUWAHATI DIVISIONAL OFFICE, WHO ARE DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY OF THE CORPORATION TO FILE AND DEFEND SUIT ETC.
2:LICI MORIGAON BRANCH REP. BY BRANCH MANAGER LICI MORIGAON BRANCH P.O. and DIST.- MORIGAON ASSAM.
3:THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE GUWAHATI AT JEEVAN PRAKASH S.S. ROAD GHY- 1 ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/2 4:LICI ZONAL OFFICE AT KOLKATA HINDUSTAN BUIDLING CHITTRANJAN AVENUE KOLKATA- 700072 WEST BENGAL.
5:CHAIRMAN OF LICI AT CENTRAL OFFICE YOGAKSHEMA JEEVAN BIMA MARG MUMBAI- 400021 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.B K BHAGAWATI, MSK KALITA,MS.A CHAKRABORTY Advocate for the Respondent : , MR.G J SHARMA(R-1-5),MR.S NATH(R-1-5)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 29-05-2025 Mr. B.K. Bhagawati, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the petitioner in this case has expired. Therefore, this matter has become infructuous. Mr. S. Nath, learned standing counsel, LIC is present. Taking note of the submission made by the petitioner’s counsel, this writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant