UDAY BHAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF ENERGY U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/4284/2025 · 2025-04-22
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133983 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133983 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22824 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4284 of 2025 Petitioner :- Uday Bhan Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Energy U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Keshav Ram Pandey,Arun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Daya Shakar Tiwari, learned Addition Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Ranvijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 4. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to immediately release all post-retirement dues, including Gratuity, GIS benefits, CPF employer contribution, and monthly pension, along with interest at the market rate, compounded preodically from the due date till actual payment."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4, i.e., Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Vidyut Vitran Khand Dvitiya, Ayodhya, Kunja Kutir, Ayodhya and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4, i.e., Executive Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Vidyut Vitran Khand Dvitiya, Ayodhya, Kunja Kutir, Ayodhya ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the
representation within a period of fifteen days from today and a copy thereof maybe sent to the opposite party no.
2 and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench