Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13397 (UTT)

NILESH YADAV v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/948/2024 · 2025-08-08

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:7028 C528 No.948 of 2024 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. None appeared for the Applicant even in the revised call. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Ever since its inception on 13.12.2024 and in the first order sheet dated 18.12.2024 it is mentioned the “No one is present on behalf of the applicant, even in the revised call.” 4. On 27.12.2024 appearance is made by learned counsel Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Bharat Chaudhary, learned counsel for the Applicant and Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 5. From perusal of the order sheet it reveals that the there was no representation on behalf of the Applicant or either the learned counsel for the Applicant had sought time. 6. Today also learned counsel for the applicant is not present. 7. The C528 application is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 08.08.2025 Arti