Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133932 (ALL)

VIJAY PRATAP GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF CO-OPERATIVE AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/4124/2025 · 2025-04-17

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21593 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4124 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Pratap Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Co- Operative And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubham Singh,Arpit Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Subham Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party Nos.1 to 4. 2. In view of the proposed order, the notices to the opposite party Nos.5 & 6 are hereby dispensed with. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 and the direction may be issued him/ her to consider and decide such representation with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has stated that he has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e. the Member Secretary, District Administrative Committee, Cooperative Societies, Lucknow/ Assistant Commissioner-cum-Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Vikas Bhawan, Lucknow, U.P. taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation after affording an opportunity of hearing to the private opposite parties and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench