Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133928 (ALL)

AZAD AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/3221/2025 · 2025-04-16

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21495 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3221 of 2025 Applicant :- Azad And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey,Ram Alok Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Sri Wasim Ahmad, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2 today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Wasim Ahmad, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been by the applicant for quashing the entire proceeding of Case No.2172 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No.184 of 2024, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Gomtinagar, District Lucknow as well as Charge Sheet No.318 of 2015 dated 25.11.2015. 4. It has been contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the respondent no.2 lodged an F.I.R. against the applicant which was registered as Case Crime No.184 of 2024, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Gomtinagar, District Lucknow. It is contended that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and entered into a compromise, and the applicants filed Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.2195 of 2025 before this Court for quashing the entire proceedings of against the applicant on the basis of said compromise, and this Court vide order dated 10.03.2025 disposed off the said application directing the parties to appear before the Court below for verification of the compromise. He submits that in pursuance of the said order, both the parties appeared before the Court below, on which the learned Magistrate verified the compromise entered into between the parties vide order dated 25.03.2025, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-6 to the present application. Hence, it is submitted that the proceeding against the applicants be quashed. 5. Sri Wasim Ahmad, learned counsel for respondent no.2 has admitted the fact of the compromise. 6. Accordingly, the present Application U/S 482 is disposed off in terms of compromise entered into between the parties, and the criminal case is also quashed. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 S.Sharma Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench