Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13392 (GAU)

SAMEER PATEL ALIAS SAMIR GAFUR PATEL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./1851/2025 · 2025-06-15

Susmita Phukan Khaund

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010116642025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1851/2025 SAMEER PATEL ALIAS SAMIR GAFUR PATEL S/O GAFUR PATEL, R/O KILLEMACCHINDRA GAD, GAFURSAHAB MANJIL, P.O. KILLEMACCHINDRA GAD P.S. ISLAMPUR GAD, DIST. SANGLI, MAHARASHTRA, PIN-415302, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BHAIRABNAGAR TILA, WARD NO. 14, P.O. AND P.S. TEZPUR, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P BORAH, MRS K M SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 16.06.2025 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. P. Borah for the petitioner Sameer Patel @Samir Gafur Patel. Page No.# 2/3 2. This application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 with prayer for bail as he is behind bars since 23.04.2025 in connection with Tezpur P.S. Case No. 276/2025 under Sections 304(2)/3(5) of the BNS corresponding to GR Case No.680/2025. 3. Heard Mr. P. S. Laskar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State. 4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has been involved in the offence purchasing stolen articles like the snatched gold chain. The gold chain was snatched away from the informant’s mother. 5. I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection. 6. I have scrutinized the Case Dairy. Investigation has progressed substantially. It appears that further custodial detention may not be required. 7. I have also considered the submission that the petitioner is willing to co- operate with the remaining part of investigation and to abide by any stringent bail conditions if imposed upon him. 8. Considering all aspects, petition is allowed. The petitioner is enlarged on bail of Rs 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand), with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Tezpur, Sonitpur, under the conditions that: (i) the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is alleged, Page No.# 3/3 (ii) the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating officer on every fortnight till completion of investigation, and (iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission. 9. On breach of any of the bail conditions, the learned Court is at liberty to cancel the bail order granted to the petitioner. 10. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant