SYED INTIZAR HUSAIN v. U.P.POWER CROP.SHAKTI BHAWAN AND 2 ORS.
WRIA/2001318/2005 · 2025-04-11
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133912 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133912 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20849
Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2001318 of 2005 Petitioner :- Syed Intizar Husain Respondent :- U.P.Power Crop.Shakti Bhawan And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- L.P.Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Sandeep Dixit Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Case called out in revised list.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present. 3.The petitioner has challenged the retirement notice with further prayer that he should be allowed to continue upto 60 years.
4. The matter pertains to the year 2005 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that by efflux of time, writ petition has become infructuous.
5. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench