Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133908 (ALL)

MANJULA CHAURASIA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/4046/2025 · 2025-04-15

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20995 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4046 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manjula Chaurasia Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Secondary Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Nag,Shyam Sundar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Nag and Sri Shyam Sundar Dubey, learned counsels for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1 and 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 3 is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner has preferred the following reliefs:- "(I) To issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon Respondent No. 2 to initiate proceedings for payment of interest for delayed period on retiral dues claimed in Para 5 of this writ petition. (II) To pass any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of Justice. (III) To award the Cost of this Petition in favour of the petitioner." Attention has been drawn towards annexure no. 6, which is an order dated 20.04.2023 passed in Writ-A No. 2959 of 2023 disposing off the representation of the petitioner giving liberty to prefer a fresh representation to the authority concerned for claiming dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that in compliance of the aforesaid order, the petitioner approached the competent authority and her dues have been paid, however, there is delay on making payment of the dues, therefore, she is claiming interest on the delayed payment. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., District Inspector of Schools, Muzaffarnagar, U.P. ventilating her grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her enclosing therewith the copy of her earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. Order Date :- 15.4.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench