The State of Tripura v. Smt Minati Das aged about 55 years
WA/117/2024 · 2025-02-07
Arindam Lodh, S Datta Purkayastha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1339 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1339 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
WA No.117 of 2024
1. The State of Tripura, to be represented by Secretary Department of Home, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Kunjaban, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799010.
2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Kunjaban, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799010.
3. The Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Kunjaban, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799010.
4. The Director General of Police, Tripura Police Head Quarter, Akhaura Road, Joynagar, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799010.
5. The Assistant Inspector General of Police, Tripura Police Head Quarter, Akhaura Road, Joynagar, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799010.
6. Principal/Chairman, Tripura Standing Medical Board, AGMC & GBP Hospital, Agartala, West Tripura, Pin-799006. ….Appellant(s) Versus Smt. Minati Das aged about 55 years, wife of Bimal Chandra Das, residents of Bolananda Palli, near Kali Bari, Barjala, Agartala, P.O-Kunjaban Kathal Bagan, P.S.-New Capital Complex, District-West Tripura, Pin-799006. ….Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s)
: Mr. S.M. Chakraborty, Advocate General
Mr. D. Sarma, Addl. GA
Ms. P. Chakraborty, Advocate
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. PURKAYASTHA ORDER 07.02.2025
Heard Mr. S.M. Chakraborty, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. D. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-State. Also heard Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. It is submitted by both the learned counsel appearing for the parties that ex- post facto referral has been given in favour of the respondent for treatment in the Institute of Neuroscience, Kolkata. In view of this, the Police Department also has communicated to the concerned department to sanction the amount raised in the MR bills.
Learned Advocate General has submitted that the process has been completed and it will be re-imbursed very soon. In view of this, we do not want to proceed with the present writ appeal as submitted by Mr. Chakraborty, learned Advocate General appearing for the appellant-State. It is expected that the re-imbursement of the medical bills shall be made within a period of 4(four) weeks. The instant writ appeal stands disposed in the above terms.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Snigdha SAIKAT KAR Digitally signed by SAIKAT KAR Date: 2025.02.07 16:19:19 +05'30'