332 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SIMRANPREET KAUR @ SIMRANJEET KAUR AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Ramandeep, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. G.S. Bains, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No. 90, dated 28.08.2025 (Annexure P and 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Ghagga, District Patiala, with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 30.11.2025 (Ann 2. During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR. 3. Vide order dated 08.01.2026, parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court and compromise was called for. 4. The report dated 30.01.2026 has been received from Civil Judge (Jr. Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate, 1 have entered into a compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SIMRANPREET KAUR @ SIMRANJEET KAUR AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Ramandeep, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. G.S. Bains, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No. 90, dated 28.08.2025 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Ghagga, District Patiala, with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 30.11.2025 (Annexure P-2). During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR. Vide order dated 08.01.2026, parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court and report with regard to the genuineness of the compromise was called for. The report dated 30.01.2026 has been received from Civil Judge (Jr. Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Samana, stating that the parties have entered into a compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-73928-2025 DECIDED ON: 10.03.2026 SIMRANPREET KAUR @ SIMRANJEET KAUR AND OTHERS .....PETITIONERS ....RESPONDENTS MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Ramandeep, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Bains, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. This is a petition under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR 1), under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Ghagga, District Patiala, with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR. Vide order dated 08.01.2026, parties were directed to appear before report with regard to the genuineness of the The report dated 30.01.2026 has been received from Civil Judge (Jr. Class, Samana, stating that the parties have entered into a compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any This is a petition under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR 1), under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Ghagga, District Patiala, with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised Vide order dated 08.01.2026, parties were directed to appear before report with regard to the genuineness of the The report dated 30.01.2026 has been received from Civil Judge (Jr. Class, Samana, stating that the parties have entered into a compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any HIMANSHU 2026.03.12 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-73928-2025 -2- 5. Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, has held:- “29. The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C. which can affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the proceedings even in noncompoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., in order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice. 30. The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is to be exercised Ex-Debitia Justitia to prevent an abuse of process of Court. There can neither be an exhaustive list nor the defined para-meters to enable a High Court to invoke or exercise its inherent powers. It will always depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has no limits. However, the High Court will exercise it sparingly and with utmost care and caution. The exercise of power has to be with circumspection and restraint. The Court is a vital and an extra-ordinary effective instrument to maintain and control social order. The Courts play role of paramount importance in achieving peace, harmony and ever- lasting congeniality in society. Resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a Court which should endeavour to givefull effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or would promote savagery.” HIMANSHU 2026.03.12 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-73928-2025 -3- 6. The legal principles as laid down for quashing of the judgment were also approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of 'Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another,(2012) 10 SCC 303'. 7. It is evident that in view of the amicable resolution of the issues amongst the parties, no useful purpose would be served by continuation of the proceedings. The furtherance of the proceedings is likely to be a waste of judicial time and there appears to be no chance of conviction. 8. In view of above, FIR No. 90, dated 28.08.2025 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Ghagga, District Patiala, with all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, is quashed qua the petitioner, on the basis of compromise dated 30.11.2025 (Annexure P-2). 9. The present petition is hereby allowed. (MANDEEP PANNU) 10.03.2026 JUDGE himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HIMANSHU 2026.03.12 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document