HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1005497 of 2005 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Sri Dilip Pandey, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioners, the same is taken on record, who made a statement that due to efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous, thus, the same may be dismissed as such. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. September 2, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Saran Nigam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anil Kumar Sharma, Bheem Chaudhary (Irshad Ali,J.) Ashok Kumar And 4 Ors. Objection Filed .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner Lucknow And 4 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench