Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13385 (UTT)

RUMA SAINI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1647/2023 · 2025-03-18

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1835 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1647 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Himanshu Pal, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned D.A.G. with Mr. Vipul Painuli, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 to 5. 3. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for respondent No.6-CBI. 4. Mr. Shobhit Joshi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.7. 5. By the previous order dated 04.03.2025, learned State Counsel was directed to file status/progress report within 10 days. 6. Today, on instruction, it is submitted by learned State Counsel that after investigation, final report has already been submitted by the police on 17.03.2025 against the petitioner, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it becomes infructuous. 7. The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 8. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner may avail the remedy available to him under Law by challenging the final report by filing a protest petition. 9. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.03.2025 PN