HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1005611 of 2005 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. List has been revised. None for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel is present. 2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. September 11, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : H.S. Tiwari, Onkar Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, A K Pandey Bistaul, Jagdish Pratap Pandey (Irshad Ali,J.) Bharat Shukla And 2 Ors. Revenue .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Jud. Faizabad And 5 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench