Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13384 (JHR)

SUJEET KUMAR UPADHYAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

WPC/2788/2024 · 2025-01-02

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.2788 of 2024 ------ 1. Sujeet Kumar Upadhyay 2. Binod Kumar 3. Amit Khalkho 4. Binod Rajak 5. Vilaspati Kumari 6. Deepak Kumar 7. Kishore Kumar Mahto 8. Nagdeeo Oraon 9. Pramod Kumar Kushwaha 10. Nilesh Kumar 11. Narsingh Rana 12. Sabita Kumari, D/o Budhram Munda 13. Sabita Kumari, W/o Mukesh Kumar Ravi 14. Vinod Chandra Pandey 15. Rajesh Kumar Rana 16. Satyanarayan Ram Mahli 17. Pintu Kumar Das 18. Sunil Kumar 19. Amod Kumar Yadav 20. Dev Kumar Yadav 21. Raj Kumar Yadav 22. Tulsi Mahto 23. Jitendra Oraon Kachhap 24. Md. Mahbub Alam 25. Jangbir Tanti 26. Afjal Ansari 27. Rama Sahsi Kumar Yadav 28. Lav Kumar Sharma 29. Umesh Kumar Ram 30. Saroj Kumar Verma 31. Manish Tirkey 32. Chandra Shekhar Pathak 33. Sandeep Kumar 34. Babujan Murmu 35. Awdhesh Saw 36. Ramesh Kumar 37. Nirmal Kumar Tiwari 38. Tuntun Kumar Dubey 39. Suresh Kumar Pandit 40. Sanjay Prasad Sah 41. Ravindra Kumar 42. Shakil Ansari 43. Azad Ansari 44. Pravin Kumar Ravi 45. Karmu Kumar 46. Pramod Kumar Ojha 47. Rajiv Ranjan Singh 48. Prahlad Kumar Singh 49. Mangal Toppo 50. Vijay Kumar Yadav 51. Sanjay Kumar Singh 2 52. Om Prakash Singh 53. Purushottam Kumar Singh 54. Jai Prakash Patel 55. Manish Kumar Rajak 56. Chandradev Kumar 57. Rajesh Khalkho 58. Rakesh Kumar Singh 59. Sanjay Kumar Sharma 60. Sant Kumar Pandey 61. Omprakash Ray 62. Ram Prawesh Kumar 63. Raj Kumar Prasad 64. Barun Kumar Choudhary 65. Sunil Kumar Mehta 66. Shambhu Rajak 67. Amir Hussain 68. Prabhu Ram 69. Naresh Sharma 70. Shankar Ram 71. Ashok Ram 72. Prasad Kumar Prasad 73. Kunal Kumar Singh 74. Barun Kumar Das 75. Nandlal Mahto 76. Ishwar Ravidas 77. Ram Ratan Sahu 78. Sanjay Kumar Yadav 79. Sandeep Kerketta … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through Director General of Police, Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of Planning & Finance, Government of Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Budget), Jharkhand, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, North Chotanagpur Region, Hazaribagh. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Koderma. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate Ms. Richa Lal, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Krishna Prajapati, AC to SC-V Mr. Kishore Kr. Singh, Advocate ------ 03/ 02.01.2025 Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners are Constables and are working in the District of Koderma. It is their grievance that they are not getting the 3 benefit of the 7th Pay Revision whereas similarly situated Constables working in the others Districts of the State are getting the said benefits. 2. Learned counsel representing the respondent-State submits that the petitioners have already filed a representation and the same is pending before the Authorities. 3. Considering the submission of the State, I direct the petitioners to file a fresh representation raising their claim before the Superintendent of Police, Koderma. If any representation is filed within six weeks, he should consider the same and if it is found that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of 7th Pay Revision, the same should be extended to them. 4. It is expected that the entire process should be concluded within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-2