Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13383 (CHH)

MOHAMMAD ALIYAN KHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1413/2025 · 2025-03-20

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:13330 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1413 of 2025 1 - Mohammad Aliyan Khan S/o Wasim Akram Khan Aged About 7 Years R/o H.No. 62, Ward No. 4, Laxmi Nagar, Supela Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) Through His Mother Namely Sabahat Zarin Khan, W/o Wasim Akram Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o H.No. 62, Ward No. 4, Laxmi Nagar, Supela Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Department Of School Education, Indravati Bhawan, Block-3 First Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 5 - District Level Committee Under Right Of Children To Free And Compulsory Education Act, 2009 Through Its Chairperson/collector, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 6 - Delhi Public School Through Its Principal, Delhi Public School, Junwani, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 7 - Additional Collector Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.21 11:27:02 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Shri Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate For State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 20/03/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the purpose for which this petition has been filed has already been concluded vide letter dated 21.1.2025 itself. However, since it has not been informed to the petitioner, as such this petition has been filed. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in case exigency arises. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh