Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22058 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4173 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Ram And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri R.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Nitin Mathur, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1 & 2 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed application for amendment in the memo of the writ petition i.e. I.A. No.2 of 2025 alongwith the petition. 4. On due consideration, the application is allowed. 5. Let necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day. 6. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed following main reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay interest to the petitioners on the delayed payment of their salary due with effect from December, 2006 to March, 2010 till actual payment in February, 2025 i.e. for about 15 years. (ii)a. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the remaining arrears of the recommendations of 7th Pay Commission and also pay the amount of General Insurance Scheme to the petitioners. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite party No. 4 to consider and decide petitioners' representation dated 25.2.2025, as contained in Annexure No.6 to this writ petition, expeditiously." 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioners have preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 8. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 9. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioners are permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, District Ambedkar Nagar taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioners by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioners forthwith. 10. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 18.4.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench