Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13381 (JHR)

TALA MARANDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2730/2025 · 2025-06-13

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15575 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2730 of 2025 ------ Tala Marandi, S/o Ramu Marandi. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P. ----- 03/ 13.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Borio P.S. Case No.61 of 2021, for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, 353, 307, 332, 333, 411 427, 379, 224, 225 and 120-B IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. It is alleged that one Surya Hansda, who is having some criminal cases, has been taken in custody by the police but several persons had forcibly taken Surya Hansda from custody of the police. 5. From the record, it is clear that the petitioner is one of them, though he has not been named in the F.I.R. 6. This case needs extensive investigation and also if necessary, to put the petitioner on Test Identification Parade (TIP). 7. Considering the nature of allegation against this petitioner, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 8. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3