Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13381 (CAL)

TAMAL MUKHERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/844/2025 · 2025-03-10

Gaurang Kanth, Joymalya Bagchi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.03.2025 42 sdas dismissed C.R.M. (A) No. 844 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Cyber Crime Police Station Ribandar, Goa Case No. 01 of 2025 dated 13.01.2025 under Sections 318(4)/319(2)/3(5) of the BNS and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. And In Re : Tamal Mukherjee ……. Petitioner Mr. Mujibar Ali Naskar ..…for the petitioner Mr. Suman De Ms. Nandini Chatterjee ….. for the State 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits his client does not want to proceed with the application. 2. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed. 3. Written instruction filed in Court be kept on record. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)