ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/3808/2025 · 2025-04-22
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133801 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133801 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22864-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3808 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Mishra,Abhishek Shukla,Manvendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner claims interference by private opposite parties No. 7 to 12 in his bhumidhari land on which the petitioner wants to construct a cattle shed. The allegation is also against the local police of conniving and interfering with such possession, however, learned Standing Counsel for the State says that an altercation has taken place between the petitioner and private opposite parties, therefore, the local police intervened and challaned them under Section 126/135 of B.N.S.S., 2023 otherwise it is not interfering in the private dispute. Let the petitioner get the boundaries of his gata demarcated under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, thereafter, seek remedial measures or seek such other remedies as may be prescribed in law. If any offence is made out under the criminal law, the petitioner is at liberty to initiate proceedings under the said law.
3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 22.4.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench