UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SUNITA TERONPI AND 8 ORS
MACApp./247/2025 · 2025-06-13
N Unni Krishnan Nair
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13378 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13378 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010116592025
2025:GAU-AS:7946
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MACApp./247/2025 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 24 WHITES ROAD, CHENNAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, DISPUR. VERSUS SUNITA TERONPI AND 8 ORS W/O LATE SANJOY SINGNAR, R/O VILL. BOMRUL ADARSHA GAON, P.S.
BAKALIA, PIN 782482, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG (ASSAM) 2:MRILIN SINGNARPI D/O LATE SANJOY SINGNAR R/O VILL. BOMRUL ADARSHA GAON P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG (ASSAM) 3:MRIDALIN SINGNARPI D/O LATE SANJOY SINGNAR R/O VILL. BOMRUL ADARSHA GAON P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG (ASSAM) 4:KLIRJIR SINGNARPI D/O LATE SANJOY SINGNAR R/O VILL. BOMRUL ADARSHA GAON P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM. Page No.# 2/4 5:BONGPI RONGPIPI MOTHER OF LATE SANJOY SINGNAR R/O VILL. BOMRUL ADARSHA GAON P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG (ASSAM) 6:PANIRAM SINGNA FATHER OF LATE SANJOY SINGNAR R/O VILL. BOMRUL ADARSHA GAON P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG (ASSAM) 7:DURGA SINGNARPI UNMARRIED SISTER OF LATE SANJOY SINGNAR R/O VILL BOMRUL ADARSHA GAON P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG (ASSAM) 8:RAMANAND YADAV S/O PUJAN YADAV VILL./P.O. PUB SILPUTA P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM. 9:KARAN CHOUHAN S/O LATE SHIVBARAT COUHAN VILL./P.O. PUB SILPUTA P.S. BAKALIA PIN 782482 DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA, MRS L SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR D K KALITA (R-1 TO 7),
Page No.# 3/4 ::: BEFORE:::
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR Name of the conciliators:
1. Mr. Binod Kumar Singh
2. Ms. Meghali Barman (O R D E R) Date : 14.06.2025
The case is put up before the National Lok Adalat. The matter is amicably settled between the parties. The claimants, herein, and the appellants United India Insurance Company Limited, represented by Mr. Swapan Maji, RM, are present before the Court today. The parties are represented by Mr. K. K. Bhatta, and Mr. D. K. Kalita. It is submitted by both the claimants and the Insurance Company’s representatives that this matter is settled between the parties at an amount of Rs. 31,00,000/-, inclusive of all components as a full and final settlement of the claim. The Insurance Company shall deposit the said amount of Rs.
31,00,000/- within a period of 45 days from today before the Registry of the Gauhati High Court. Failure to deposit the above-noted amount within the stipulated time by the Insurance Company, the above amount would carry an interest @ 7% from the date of filing of the claim petition before the learned Tribunal. From the total compensation amount of Rs. 31,00,000/-; an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/-, each, shall be released and kept in Fixed Deposit Accounts in the
Page No.# 4/4 names of claimant No. 2 viz. Miss Mirlin Singnarpi; claimant No. 3 viz. Mirdalin Singnarpi; and claimant No. 4 viz. Miss Klirjir Singnarpi; respectively, with a nationalized Bank/Post Office till they attain the age of majority. Further, an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/-, Rs. 1,00,000/-, Rs. 50,000/-, as well as the balance amount of Rs. 12,50,000/-, shall be released to claimant No. 5 viz. Smti. Bongpi Rongpipi; claimant No. 6 viz. Sri Paniram Singna; claimant No. 7 viz. Miss Durga Singnarpi; and claimant No. 1 viz. Smti. Sunita Teronpi, respectively; by the Registry of the Gauhati High Court upon furnishing of adequate documents for their identification as well as the particulars of their Bank Accounts. Statutory Deposit, if any, made by the Insurance Company being not a part of the amount so settled today; the same be released to the Insurance Company on an application made by it in this connection. The appeal, accordingly, stands disposed of in terms of the amicable settlement reached between the parties. The compromise format signed by the parties is kept on record. LCRs, if any, be remitted to the concerned learned Tribunal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant