Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133775 (PNJ)

HARBANS SIGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PB AND ANOTHER

CWP/4982/2002 · 2025-02-21

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-4982-2002 ! " "#$ % & ' & $"("&) $( "# * &+ , & & &+- & ). ./"0 , 0*- -+ (1 , +-),- $2* 0!-* 0 .0*-* % - &- #", & +2" !""# $% &'( &)*&+# "++(," )")#&*-.-((',+-"##"(/ %)!0 )1 #-" +)23 45467) 5677 The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents would not be averse to considering the matter, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioners are MOHIT 2025.02.21 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4982-2002 232 found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to them and shall contain reasons, whereupon they shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 34533536 8, 3 & /0 9 0' 3 &- 9 0' MOHIT 2025.02.21 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document