1 2025:CGHC:16789 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 2214 of 2025 1 - Ashish Yadav S/o Jaiprakash Yadav Aged About 23 Years R/o Village- Chera Barunpara, Police Chouki Dindo, Police Station Trikunda, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Trikunda, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 09/04/2025 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 25/2024, registered at Police Station Trikunda, District-Balrampur-Ramanujganj (CG) for 2 the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 498A, 34 of IPC. 2. As per prosecution the details of the case are as that accused Jaiprakash Yadav, Rita Devi, Ashish Yadav, Lilesh Yadav, murdered Pooja Yadav, wife of Ashish Yadav in village Chera Varunpara, outpost Dindo, Police Station Trikunda, District Varunpara, Outpost Dindo in the night of 14.05.2024 and threw the body of the deceased in the well of Ramjeet of Village Chera. On the basis of inquest, crime no. 25/2024 under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of IPC has been registered against Jaiprakash Yadav, Rita Devi, Ashish Yadav, Lilesh Yadav and taken into investigation. The crime has been registered and the applicants were arrested. 3. It was argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is in jail since 17.05.2024, charge sheet has been filed and conclusion of the trial will take some time. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application and submits that all the evidences are against the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & 3 gravity of the offence, material available in the case dairy, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Accordingly, the bail application of applicant- Ashish Yadav involved in Crime No. 25/2024 under Sections 302, 201, 498(A) and 34 of IPC at Police Station- Trikunda, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh, is rejected. 7. However, this Court hopes and trusts that the Trial Court shall make earnest endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously as soon as possible in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima