PREDIMAN KRISHAN TICKOO v. UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS GOI NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1377/2023 · 2025-11-12
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13375 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13375 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1377/2023
Cav. No. 652/2023
Prediman Krishan Tickoo
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. P.N. Raina, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate
Vs
Union of India & Ors. .….Respondents
Through: Mr. Jugal Kishore Gupta, Advocate for R-2 & 3 Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for R-4 to 6
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (12.11.2025)
01. The subject matter of the writ petition is said to have been settled amicably by virtue of a family settlement made between the petitioner and private respondent No. 4 both of whom are brothers and in view of that settlement, a consent award is said to have been passed which gives rest to the dispute to govern the future relationship between the two.
02. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
12.11.2025
SUNIL
Serial No. 10 Regular List