Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13375 (JK)

PREDIMAN KRISHAN TICKOO v. UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS GOI NEW DELHI AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1377/2023 · 2025-11-12

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1377/2023 Cav. No. 652/2023 Prediman Krishan Tickoo …..Petitioner Through: Mr. P.N. Raina, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate Vs Union of India & Ors. .….Respondents Through: Mr. Jugal Kishore Gupta, Advocate for R-2 & 3 Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for R-4 to 6 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (12.11.2025) 01. The subject matter of the writ petition is said to have been settled amicably by virtue of a family settlement made between the petitioner and private respondent No. 4 both of whom are brothers and in view of that settlement, a consent award is said to have been passed which gives rest to the dispute to govern the future relationship between the two. 02. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn as having been rendered infructuous. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 12.11.2025 SUNIL Serial No. 10 Regular List