Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13374 (KAR)

GURUPRASAD v. SMT ANURADHA L ACHARYA

CRP/19/2024 · 2025-06-19

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21362 CRP No. 19 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 19 OF 2024 (SC) BETWEEN: GURUPRASAD, S/O RAMESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PROPRIETOR SIRI ELECTRONICS, OPP. POST OFFICE, SURATHKAL, MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 158. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. ANURADHA L. ACHARYA, W/O LAXMINARAYANA ACHARYA, AGED 44 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX SRI KRISHNA ENTERPRISES, GROUND FLOOR, SATHYAJEETH ENCLAVE, ALVARES ROAD, KADRI, KAIBATTAL, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 002. …RESPONDENT THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION OF 18 OF SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2023 PASSED IN SC.NO.35/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANGALURU.D.K, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21362 CRP No. 19 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER This Court on 05.06.2025, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows: “One week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. If office objections are complied with, Office to post the matter on the ensuing Thursday. In the event, office objections are not complied with, the petition would be dismissed for its non-prosecution." 2. Even today, office objections are not complied with. 3. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1 CT: BHK