IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2994 of 2024 ------ Jakir Miyan aged about 40 Years S/O Late Abdul Gani R/O Village- Tetar Toli P.O. & P.S.- Jari, District- Gumla (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party With A.B.A. No.3046 of 2024 ------ Hesabul Miyan @ charku Miya @ Charku, aged about 25 years, Son of Akbar Khan, Resident of village – Tetartoli P.O- Lawabar & P.S.- Jari, Dist.- Gumla. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party With A.B.A. No.3050 of 2024 ------ Nastar Khan @ Md. Nastar Khan, aged about 35 years, Son of Nasir Minya, Resident of village – Tetartoli P.O & P.S- Jari, Dist.- Gumla. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party With A.B.A. No.3061 of 2024 ------ Saddam Miyan aged about 31 years, son of Samsuddin Miyan, Resident of Village- Parsa, Post Office & Police Station- Jari, District- Gumla. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate (A.B.A. No.2994 of 2024) Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate (A.B.A. No.3046 of 2024 & A.B.A. No.3050 of 2024) Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate (A.B.A. No.3061 of 2024) For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P. (A.B.A. No.2994 of 2024) Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P (A.B.A. No.3046 of 2024) Ms. Shweta Singh, Addl.P.P. (A.B.A. No.3050 of 2024) Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl.P.P. (A.B.A. No.3061 of 2024) ------ Order No.02 Dated-23-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Jari P.S. Case No.02 of 2024 instituted under Section 11 (1) (b) of Animal Cruelty Act, 1960 and Section 12 (1) of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in illegal business of bovine flesh by selling the same. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the A.B.A. No.2994 of 2024, para-11 of the A.B.A. No.3046 of 2024, para-11 of the A.B.A. No.3050 of 2024 and para-19 of the A.B.A. No.3061 of 2024, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Gumla in connection with Jari P.S. Case No.02 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/