Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13370 (KAR)

SRI NADEEM AHMAD SIDDIQUI v. STATE BY CBI, ACB, BENGALURU

WP/1351/2025 · 2025-01-30

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4723 WP No. 1351 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 1351 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI NADEEM AHMAD SIDDIQUI S/O MASHOOD AHMAD SIDDIQUI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/A , ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, NATIONAL INSTITUTION OF UNANI MEDICINE, BENGALURU, PRESENTLY R/A QTR. NO.03, TYPE-IV, STAFF QUARTERS, NATIONAL INSTITUTION OF UNANI MEDICINE CAMPUS, KOTTEGEPALYA, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, VISWANEEDAM, BENGALURU-560091 PERMANENT ADD H NO. 17 SHAIKHAN UPPERKOTE BULANDSHAHAR UTTAR PRADESH 203 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGENDRA NAIK R.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY CBI, ACB, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY SPL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SRI. NARAYAN KUNDAPUR S/O KRISHNA KUNDAPUR, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/A NATIONAL INSTITUTION OF UNANI MEDICINE CAMPUS, KOTTIGEPALYA, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, VISWANEEDAM, BENGALURU-560 009. PRESENTLY R/A DOOR NO.35, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4723 WP No. 1351 of 2025 SUBBANNA GAREN, VIJAYANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 040. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF CPC, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PETITIONER SPL.C.C.NO.728/2024 PENDING BEFORE THE FILE OF HONBLE BEFORE THE HONBLE XXI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES BENGALURU (CCH-4) FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 7 OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file an appropriate discharge application before the Trial Court, who shall consider the same, in accordance with law. All rival contentions on all aspects - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4723 WP No. 1351 of 2025 of the matter are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE Srl. List No.: 2 Sl No.: 88