Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13370 (JHR)

MUKESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3912/2025 · 2025-06-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:14963] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3912 of 2025 ------ Mukesh Kumar, aged about 24 years, son of Vishnu Manjhi, resident of Village Chitarpoka, P.o. Ghormara, P.S. Mohanpur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-10-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.34 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84C of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and he has defrauded the victim Ram Krishna Kumar to the tune of Rs.5,573/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that one mobile phone without SIM card was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.02.2025 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-14 of the instant Bail Application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to transfer Rs.5,573/- to the bank account of Ram Krishna Kumar without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transfer of Rs.5,573/- to the bank account of Ram Krishna Kumar without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.34 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/