CRM-M -70884- IN THE H (240) Shahil @ Mohd. State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. A Mr. R Mr. R MANISHA BATR CRM-50997-2025 1. Appli CRM-M-70884- 1. The p 439 Cr.P.C. for g 14.05.2025 registe under Section 109 City I Malerkotla, 2. The a recorded by comp the same night he abuses to him on h Kaif alongwith the outside the house -2025 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH ohd. Sahil @ Bhadewala Versus
and another HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Abdul Aziz, Advocate and Mr. Arzoo Modi, Advocate for the pe Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab r. R.S. Rana, Advocate for responde ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL) 2025 Application is allowed as prayed for, -2025 (O&M)
The present petition has been filed for grant of regular bail in case aris registered under Sections 125, 351(2) on 109(1), 191(3) and 190 of BNS ad rkotla, District Malerkotla. The aforementioned FIR was registe complainant-Mohammad Shehbaz o ght he had received a call from Moham m on his cell phone. Some time there ith the petitioner, the co-accused and house of the complainant and started JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-70884-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.01.2026 ... Petitioner
...Respondents
ANISHA BATRA
the petitioner Punjab spondent No.2 d for, subject to all just exceptions. filed by the petitioner under Section se arising out of FIR No.103 dated 51(2) and 25 of Arms Act (Offence NS added later on) at Police Station registered on the basis of statement baz on 14.05.2025 alleging that on ohammad Kaif who started hurling e thereafter the accused-Mohammad d and some unknown persons, came tarted firing with some firearms. At M) 2026 ction ated ence ation ment at on rling mad came . At AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M -70884- that time, the com also fired a shot in with their respect escape. The assa house with a bom initiated. The ac arrested on 16.05. The petitioner wa disclosure stateme accused were also stands completed. 2. It is a falsely implicated in another case re serve any useful p will take consider cannot be a groun also been arrived a the dispute betwe petitioner deserves 3. Status State counsel. It allegations agains also pending again -2025 2 e complainant was standing on the roo shot in the air. Thereafter, co-accused espective weapons. The petitioner a e assailants then left while proclaimi a bomb. After registration of FIR, in he accused Mohammad Kaif @ Poti 16.05.2025. Recovery of some fire a er was arrested on 21.05.2025. He statement admitting his involvement re also nominated and arrested subs leted. is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case. He is in custody si ase registered against him. His conti seful purpose. He is not required for nsiderable time to conclude. Anoth ground to deny benefit of bail to him rived at between the petitioner, co-acc between them, has been resolved. I serves to be released on bail. Status report and custody certificate el. It is argued by learned State c against the petitioner. He is a habitu g against him. There are chances of c the roof of his house. The petitioner ccused Ali and Moon also fired shots ioner and his mother had a narrow claiming that they will blow up his FIR, investigation proceedings were Potia and some co-accused were e fire arms was effected from them. He was interrogated and suffered ement in the crime. Some other d subsequently. Investigation now for the petitioner that he has been tody since 21.05.2025. He is on bail continued detention is not going to d for further investigation. The trial Another case pending against him to him. Moreso, a compromise has accused and the complainant and ed. It is, therefore, urged that the tificate have been filed by learned tate counsel that there are serious habitual offender as another case is es of committing similar offences by ioner s rrow p his were were hem. fered other now been bail to trial him e has t and t the rned rious se is es by AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M -70884- him if released on to be extended the 4. Learn the factum of com 5. This the parties at consi 6. The unlawful assembly that assembly, h complainant and h incident. The pe stands completed. no prosecution wi petitioner in other of bail to him. It i an exception. Eve conviction senten compromise stated Court is of the op stage. However, petitioner in custo the opinion that Accordingly, the p on bail subject t -2025 3 sed on bail. It is, therefore, urged that ed the benefit of bail. Learned counsel for the respondent N f compromise and has not contested th This Court has heard the submission t considerable length. The petitioner is alleged to have sembly with the co-accused and in pro , he had allegedly fired shots t and his family members. However, he petitioner is in custody since 21 leted. The trial will obviously take co ion witnesses has been examined so other cases cannot be considered to b m. It is well settled proposition of law . Even otherwise pre-trial incarcerati sentencing. The petitioner has p stated to have been arrived at betw the opinion that no relevance can be ever, given the nature of the allegat custody and in view of the above di that the petitioner has made out , the petition is allowed and the petiti ject to his furnishing personal as d that the petitioner does not deserve dent No.2-complainant has affirmed sted the petition. issions made by learned counsel for have formed membership of an in prosecution of common object of hots with an attempt to kill the ever, none had received injury in the nce 21.05.2025. Investigation now ake considerable time to conclude as ed so far. The involvement of the ed to be a reason for denying benefit of law that bail is the rule and jail is rceration shall not be replica of post- has placed on record copy of a t between the parties. Though, this an be given to this document at this allegations, the period spent by the ove discussed facts, this Court is of e out a case for release on bail. e petitioner is ordered to be released al as well as surety bonds to the serve rmed l for f an ct of the n the now de as f the nefit ail is - of a , this t this the is of bail. ased the AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M -70884- satisfaction of the concerned and on (i) ind fac ma (i circ (iii hea (iv) res info (v) num swi (vi) det his 7. In the petitioner, it shal application seekin -2025 4 of the learned trial Court/Chief Judici nd on the following conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall not dire inducement, threat or promise to a facts of the case or tamper with th manner whatsoever.
(ii) The petitioner shall not le circumstance without permission of (iii) The petitioner shall appear b hearing.
(iv) The petitioner shall provide h residing after release and shall n informing the concerned IO/SHO. (v) The petitioner shall upon his r number to concerned IO/SHO and switched on all times.
(vi) The petitioner shall surrender details of his cell phone and Aadh his mobile number(s) during the pe In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent to seeking cancellation of bail.
Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate t directly or indirectly make any se to any person acquainted with the with the evidence of the case in any not leave the country under any sion of the learned trial Court.
pear before each and every date of vide his address where he would be shall not change the same without SHO.
n his release give his mobile phone O and shall keep his mobile phone rrender his passport, if any, furnish Aadhar card, and shall not change the pendency of the trial.
y FIR/complaint lodged against the dent to seek redressal by filing an trate any h the any any te of ld be thout hone hone rnish ange t the g an AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M -70884- 8. It is m the purpose of dec on the merits of th 9. Since any, is rendered in 27.01.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 5 It is made clear that any observation of deciding the present petition and t s of the case.
Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MAN Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
vation made herein above is only for and the same shall have no bearing een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
y for aring n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.28 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.