Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1337 (AP)

Smt B. J. Tejovathi, v. K. Mallikarjuna, IAS,

CC/2190/2025 · 2026-04-08

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010414842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2190 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-17 [3506] Smt.B.J.Tejovathi, ...Petitioner Vs. K.Mallikarjuna, IAS and Others ...Contemnor(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioner: POODATTU AMARENDER Advocate(s) for Contemnor(s): Mr.K.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, K SWARNA SESHU CORAM :SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 9th April 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel for respondent has filed memo dated 09.04.2026 enclosing the copy of proceedings dated 17.03.2026 issued by District BC Welfare & Empowerment Officer, SPSR Nellore District, by which, orders have been passed determining revised pay scales and also proceedings dated 18.03.2026, by which the subsequent increments came to be ordered. Further, by proceedings dated 18.03.2026, orders have been issued with respect to leave/half pay leave and other monetary benefits. In that view of the matter, it is stated that petitioner is being extended with the necessary benefits upon revision of pay scales, which is in compliance with the orders passed by this Court. 2 CGR, J C.C. No.2190 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for petitioner did not dispute or deny the same, however, it is stated that petitioner has yet to receive the monetary benefits in terms of aforesaid orders sanctioning the respective benefits. 3. The sum and substance of directions issued by the Court, in the opinion of this Court, have been taken care of. The respondents are expected to follow up and ensure that the monetary benefits flow to the petitioner in terms of aforesaid sanction orders. 4. Accordingly, this contempt case stands closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this case, if any, shall stand closed. CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J ss