Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133684 (MAD)

C.Deepalakshmi v. The Director General of Police

WP(MD)/12229/2025 · 2025-04-29

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.12229 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.12229 of 2025 C.Deepalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Director General of Police, O/o.Director General of Police, Post Box No. 601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. 2. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3. Samiyappan, Sub-Inspector of Police, Austinpatty Police Station, Madurai District. 4. Balusamy, Sub-Inspector of Police, Austinpatty Police Station, Madurai District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12229 of 2025 5. Rajalakshmi, Constable, Austinpatty Police Station, Madurai District.. 6. Senthil, Constable, Austinpatty Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing to the 1st respondent to take necessary direction to the 2nd respondent take appropriate action as against the respondents 3 to 6 in the light of petitioner's representation dated 17.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A. Ramesh, For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar 1 & 2 Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to take necessary direction to the second respondent to take appropriate action as against the respondents 3 to 6 based on the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12229 of 2025 petitioner's representation dated 17.03.2025. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner's representation was already considered and closed. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. 3.Today, a copy of the closure report was also served to the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 4.Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the closure of the complaint, if she is aggrieved, in the manner known to law. 29.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12229 of 2025 To 1. The Director General of Police, O/o.Director General of Police, Post Box No. 601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. 2. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.12229 of 2025 P.DHANABAL , J. LR W.P(MD)No.12229 of 2025 29.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis