ANIL KUMAR YADAV AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (SAMAJ KALYAN) LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/3030/2024 · 2025-08-18
Abdul Moin
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48108 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3030 of 2024 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Samaj Kalyan) Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjai Kumar Singh,Rani Yadav,Ravi Kant Shukla,Siddharth Tripathi,Som Kartik Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard Shri Som Kartik, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Jitendra Pal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents No.1 to 4.
2. Nobody responds on behalf of the respondent No.5, despite the office report dated 02.07.2024 indicating deemed service on the respondent No.5.
3. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being decided finally.
4. There is consensus at Bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the order dated 10.12.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Review Petition (C) No. .. of 2024 [Diary No(s). 4961/2024] in Civil Appeal No. 7873 of 2023 in re: Vishwanath & Ors. Vs. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
5. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is disposed of. It is provided that the
petitioners would also be entitled the benefit, as
directed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the order dated 10.12.2024 passed in the case of Vishwanath (Supra).
6. Consequently, the order impugned dated 03.04.2024 passed by the respondent no. 3, a copy of which is Annexure No. 1 to the petition, is quashed.
7. Consequences to follow. [Abdul Moin, J.]
Order Date :- 18.8.2025 cks/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench