MAHENDRA PRATAP SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/3982/2025 · 2025-04-11
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133632 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20863 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3982 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Shukla,Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Shyam Narayan Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Raghvendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava,
learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 2 to 5.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party Nos.3 & 5 to make update payment of EPF & EPS-95 Pensionery benefits from the due date with interest on delayed payment. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party Nos.3 & 5 to decide the representation dated 26.03.2025 made by the petitioner addressed to the opposite party Nos.3 & 5, contained as Annexure No.2."
3. Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 to 5 has stated that the petitioner is to furnish a copy of Adhar Card showing his name as has been indicated in his service record and as soon as the petitioner fulfills such formality the needful exercise shall be undertaken at the earliest.
4. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e. the Regional Manager, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider
and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition say within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. Thereafter, the opposite party No.5 i.e. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub-Regional Office (SRO) Employee's Provident Fund Regional Office, Leader Road, Prayagraj may also take appropriate decision within a further period of four weeks, strictly in accordance with law, and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.
5. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is
disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench