Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13361 (UTT)

PARVEEN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/952/2024 · 2025-01-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C528 No.952 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Unnati Pant, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA with Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder (appeared through V.C.) for the State. 3. Today, the matter is listed on correction application (MCC No.2/2025). 4. The present correction application has been filed by the applicants seeking correction of the order dated 09.01.2025. In the said order, this Court permitted the learned counsel for the applicants to withdraw the C528 application, after it was brought to the Court’s attention that two similar applications had been filed by the applicants seeking the same relief. 5. Upon perusal of the order dated 09.01.2025, this Court is of the view that no interference is warranted. Accordingly, the correction application is misconceived, legally untenable, and is hereby rejected. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.09.2025 AK