1 2025:CGHC:14977-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 176 of 2025 Smt. Jewar Bai Nathani W/o Kundan Nathani Aged About 48 Years R/o Gurunanak Nagar, Behind Malwa Hotel, G.E. Road, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Superintendent of Police Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Station House Officer Police Station- Mujgahan, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rakesh Lakhwani S/o Shri Ghanshyamdas Lakhwani Aged About 50 Years R/o House No.- 301, Metro Heights, Telibandha, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Himanshu Meghwani S/o Shri Roshanlal Meghwani Aged About 36 Years R/o Govind Nagar, Pandri, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Sansakar Jain Aged About 45 Years R/o 246/1, Sadar Bazaar, Jhabak Bada, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Vishal Agrawal S/o Suresh Kumar Agrawal Aged About 30 Years R/o House No.-2816, Navjeevan Society, Pachpedi Naka, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Surbhi Agrawal W/o Vishal Agrawal Aged About 30 Years R/o Villa No.-23, Lavesta Society, Amlidih, Raipur, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.03.28 14:29:57 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Bakhtiyar, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 28.03 .2025 1 Heard Mr. Shikhar Bakhtiyar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No.1 and 2. 2 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following relief(s): “10.1 That this Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 and 2 to take appropriate steps upon the complaint of the petitioner and investigate against the respondent no.3 to 7. 10.2 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 and 2 to register the FIR against the accused persons / respondent no.3-7. 10.3 That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also be granted in favor of the petitioner safeguarding their interest.” 3 3 On perusal of the prayers in the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the prayers which are defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayers, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition with proper prayers. 4 Learned State counsel has no objection. 5 Accordingly the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn on the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs.1,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and submit a receipt of the same at the time of filing of the fresh petition, if any, and the amount so deposited, if any, shall be transmitted to the Government Children’s Home for Orthopedically Handicapped, Mana Camp, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu