IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9018/2025 Decided on: 30.05.2025 Sundla Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Parkash, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner has prayed for following substantive relief:- “ That the retirement of the petitioner at the age of 58 years, on 31.01.2018 may be held to be illegal and against the law declared by this Hon’ble State of H.P. and others and the petitioner may be held to be retired at the age of 60 years.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the petitioner has not filed any representation to her employer for the redressal of her grievance. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 4. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with direction that as soon as the petitioner prefers a representation to the respondents/competent authority, the same shall be decided, in accordance with law, by the respondents/competent authority, within a reasonable time. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 30th May, 2025 (rohit)