APHC010162132013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25226/2013 Between: 1. GANGAPATNAM MOHAN AMBEDKAR @ MOHAN,, S/O. SUBBULAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, STATE VICE PRESIDENT OF MALA MAHANADU, REG. NO.2377/1997, 0/O. HIG 109, BALAJI NAGAR, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD, R/O. D.NO.15/69, SUBEDARPET, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. PUTHETI PRAMEELA, D/O. RAMAIAH, H.NO.27/1799, TEACHERS COLONY, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, LEGAL AND DISCIPLINARY SECTION, SATISHDAVAN SPACE CENTRE, SHAR, SRIHARI KOTA, SULLURPET MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524 121. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ mandamus and declare the order of granting stay of operation of RC No. C5/1324/2009, dated 29-01-2013, vide Memo No. 2261/CV-I/2013, dated 26- 2 02-2013 of the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Maharastra Vs Milind and Others [2001(1)SCC 4] and the constitution (Scheduled Castes) order 1950 and consequently set aside the order of granting stay vide Memo No. 2261/CV- 1/2013, dated 26-02-2013, and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 31115 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Memo No. 2261/CV1/2013, dated 26-02-2013 issued by the 1st Respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2. AMRUTHA SANJEEVA The Court made the following ORDER: Sri G.Ratna Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri B.Sesibushan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by afflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and rendered infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 27.06.2025 KA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25226/2013 Date: 27.06.2025 KA