2025:HHC:5833-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 2447 of 2020 Decided on : 12.03.2025 State of Himachal Pradesh. …Petitioner Versus M/s Jai Shree Balaji Foods. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. For the respondent : Ms. Suhani Gautam, Advocate, vice Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General submits that as there is technical flaw in the writ petition, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petitioner, with liberty to file a fresh petition, on the same cause. 2. The technical defect pointed out by learned Additional Advocate General is that the writ petition has been filed through Collector, District Solan, H.P, ignoring the fact that one of the orders has also been passed by Collector, District 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:5833-DB Solan, H.P. 3. Accordingly, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 12, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)