Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13356 (UTT)

AJENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1378/2024 · 2025-05-15

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1378 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Naman Kamboj, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would challenge the charge- sheet in the appropriate proceedings before this Court. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 15.05.2025 Ravi