IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.367 of 2025 in CWP No.2801 of 2021 Decided on: 21.05.2025 Prince Sharma and others … Petitioners Versus Himachal Pradesh Vidhan Sabha … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. K.S. Banyal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Uday Banyal, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Uday Singh Banyal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and on his instructions Mr. K.S. Banyal, learned Senior Counsel also appeared on behalf of the said respondent. 2. Learned Senior Counsel on the basis of instructions received from Secretary, H.P. Vidhan Sabha, dated 20.05.2025, informs the Court that necessary order has already been passed by the Authority in compliance to the directions passed by the Court. The copy of the order is appended with the instructions. 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has perused the same and he submits that he is satisfied with the order passed by the appropriate Authority. The instructions are taken on record. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 4. In view of the above, the petition stands closed. It goes without saying that the actual monetary benefits to which the petitioner is entitled to be released in his favour as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 21, 2025 (Vinod)