Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133557 (ALL)

PAWAN TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHERS

A482/3208/2025 · 2025-04-16

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21281 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3208 of 2025 Applicant :- Pawan Tripathi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Anothers Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar,Ajay Kumar Ojha,Akansha Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar, (Adv. Roll B/P 1141) holding brief of Sri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the impugned Charge Sheet No. 214 of 2023 dated 10.08.2023 arising out of Case Crime No.0294 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC, Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh as well as impugned summoning order dated 01.09.2023 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.13, Pratapgarh in Criminal Case No.15953 of 2023; State vs. Pawan Tripathi. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press other prayers made in the prayer clause and has confined his prayer only to the relief that the applicant is ready to surrender before the trial court and in case, applicant files an application for bail, his bail application may be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773. 4. Per contra, learned AGA has opposed the prayer. 5. In view of the above statement, it is directed that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within 30 days from today and applies for bail, his bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra) after hearing both the parties. 6. For a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant surrenders and moves such an application for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench